Will you +1? I will.


Google has taken a lot of criticism for failure to launch in the social sphere. Some cite the launch of +1 for websites as the most recent example of missing the boat. But I say it’s ok to launch a social signal before a (second) social platform. They serve different purposes.

I agree that Google Wave was awful, at least in terms of roll out. How can you possibly expect a social platform to succeed when users’ friends and coworkers don’t receive invitations? Social just isn’t social without your network. Not to mention its freakish complexity.

So how, then, can +1 succeed without a social network behind it? In its far more limited scope, just having contacts in Gmail constitutes a network.

As someone who uses Google products regularly, from Gmail and Google calendar to Google docs and Android, not to mention AdWords and search, the number of people associated with my Google account is lightyears ahead of the number I could find on our invite to Wave. Which was 6. And they weren’t the 6 people I needed to collaborate with most. Shrug.

The lower threshold of participation in +1, as well as its simplicity, is already a big step in the right direction. While +1s won’t impact rankings (today), the potential for searchers to see their friends’ and coworkers’ +1s in search results would be a powerful way to encourage click through to your listing vs. a competitor’s.

With a single click you can recommend that raincoat, news article or favorite sci-fi movie to friends, contacts and the rest of the world. The next time your connections search, they could see your +1’s directly in their search results, helping them find your recommendations when they’re most useful.
— Google Blog

Granted, the effectiveness of +1 as a differentiator for your search marketing efforts depends on your audience’s (and their networks’) adoption of Google products. But for the relatively low price of adding a button, it’s worth a try in my books. I’ve got the request in to my dev team already.

Now the problem is juggling all these darned buttons without hopelessly cluttering the design – 2 for Twitter, 2 for Facebook, one for email, now +1. Isn’t there a more elegant solution that doesn’t just roll them all up into one invisible “add this”? Bueller?

Web PieRat logo.

Originally posted on Web PieRat.

Server Header Status Infographic: Geeky SEO Joy

Dr. Pete’s infographic on SEOmoz entitled “An SEO’s Guide to HTTP Status Codes” is pure geeky fun, and educational to boot.

As an in-house SEO, I spend a fair amount of time talking about http status codes. Sometimes I think I should just record myself saying, “We’re going to 301 that, right?” But an infographic is way more fun. As soon as I finish this quick post, I’m going to forward it to all my SEO BFFs in DevLand. Thanks, Dr. Pete!

As long as we’re talking geeky server header status visuals, maybe I’ll send my devs my duplicate content decision matrix for a double dose of visual SEO education. And for a dash of humor, perhaps Danny Sullivan’s “Matt Cutts Debunking Flowchart.”

Web PieRat logo.

Originally posted on Web PieRat.